colinxm wrote: Auto gearbox? Horrid, thirsty slugomatics...I've had two of the things, #1 a 2.0l petrol and
then a 2.1td (Bosch donor) and while I found them great in congested town driving my opinion
is that they totally sap all life out of the xm's. I eventually converted my 2.0 SEI to a manual
box and although the 2.0l engine is pretty limited the difference was astonishing.
My feelings about autoboxes exactly Colin. Whilst it may suit the "laid back executive express"
perceived image many have for Xm's I can't help feeling the engines aren't up to the slugomatic;
this is in no small part due to the bizarre French engine cc taxation bracketing over the years
that has forever distorted Citroen's engines.
It doesn't have to be this way, chuck away the cat on a 2.0i too and it flies - believe me!!
Someone actually stopped me when I stopped for fuel once and asked me what cc engine I was
using as he'd been following me whilst I was towing a CX on a car transporter trailer up silly steep
hills; he wouldn't believe me when I told him it was a 2.0 - I had to show him the engine bay and
he blew a whistle and vowed he'd look at buying an Xm himself as he originally thought they
were underengined for the body!!
Andrew