Apparently it is in showroom condition.
I dunno, its a lot of money for a XM, but I'd rather spend that kind of money and get a Xm than a lot of the other tat out there that would cost the same.
Reality distorter required?
-
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 4546
- Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 1:08 pm
Re: Reality distorter required?
1990 XM 2.1 Turbo SD
2008 Volvo V70 D5 SE Lux Automatic
2009 Volvo XC90 D5 SE Automatic
2008 Volvo V70 D5 SE Lux Automatic
2009 Volvo XC90 D5 SE Automatic
-
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 14433
- Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 6:44 pm
Re: Reality distorter required?
Has he been underneath? It's easy to make a car look good on top.robert_e_smart wrote:Apparently it is in showroom condition.
Mine's the reverse of this, all the dodgy bits are on the visible bodywork, underneath it's the best one I've seen. Not perfect, but I'm working on it.
91 3.0 sei M. 4852 EXY Black
92 2.1 sed M. 5740 ECZ Sable Phenicien
92 3.0 V6-24. 5713 EXY Black
92 2.1 sd M. 5685 ENT Blue Sideral
Prev
90 2.1sd M. 5049 EJV Mandarin
92 2.1sd A. 5698 EJV Mandarin
94 2.1sd A. 6218 ERT Triton
91 2.0si M. 5187 EWT White
92 2.1 sed M. 5740 ECZ Sable Phenicien
92 3.0 V6-24. 5713 EXY Black
92 2.1 sd M. 5685 ENT Blue Sideral
Prev
90 2.1sd M. 5049 EJV Mandarin
92 2.1sd A. 5698 EJV Mandarin
94 2.1sd A. 6218 ERT Triton
91 2.0si M. 5187 EWT White
-
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 4546
- Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 1:08 pm
Re: Reality distorter required?
No idea at all. I hope for his sake that it is as good underneath as it is above. I look forward to seeing a 3.5 K XM in the flesh, and compare its condition to my stock.
My SD is good on top, and less good underneath. It needs a small patch, and a good wax oyling underneath.
My SD is good on top, and less good underneath. It needs a small patch, and a good wax oyling underneath.
1990 XM 2.1 Turbo SD
2008 Volvo V70 D5 SE Lux Automatic
2009 Volvo XC90 D5 SE Automatic
2008 Volvo V70 D5 SE Lux Automatic
2009 Volvo XC90 D5 SE Automatic