Interesting XM review / test

Off topic chat about anything you like. Doesn't have to be about XMs (though they will inevitibly come up!). You can even discuss non-Citroens :o in here!
Post Reply
Dieselman
Global Moderator
Posts: 14429
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 6:44 pm

Re: Interesting XM review / test

Post by Dieselman » Fri Nov 23, 2012 6:27 pm

Not sure I have. I do have the Xantia_Evasion_Xm guide.

Do you have links to the others.
91 3.0 sei M. 4852 EXY Black
92 2.1 sed M. 5740 ECZ Sable Phenicien
92 3.0 V6-24. 5713 EXY Black
92 2.1 sd M. 5685 ENT Blue Sideral
Prev
90 2.1sd M. 5049 EJV Mandarin
92 2.1sd A. 5698 EJV Mandarin
94 2.1sd A. 6218 ERT Triton
91 2.0si M. 5187 EWT White

robertmnorton
Could do a 2.1 headgasket
Posts: 1132
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 10:07 pm
Location: Grantown-on-Spey

Re: Interesting XM review / test

Post by robertmnorton » Fri Nov 23, 2012 7:19 pm

Hi Dman, that's it.p268 Cit services website call it the mechs handbook. Also attached S1 chp 9.
robertm
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Dieselman
Global Moderator
Posts: 14429
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 6:44 pm

Re: Interesting XM review / test

Post by Dieselman » Fri Nov 23, 2012 9:23 pm

I do have that already, but thanks.

So 0.6mm is correct for a series 1 car, which is presumably why they ride a bit brittle.

I'll have a play as 0.7 seems much better.
91 3.0 sei M. 4852 EXY Black
92 2.1 sed M. 5740 ECZ Sable Phenicien
92 3.0 V6-24. 5713 EXY Black
92 2.1 sd M. 5685 ENT Blue Sideral
Prev
90 2.1sd M. 5049 EJV Mandarin
92 2.1sd A. 5698 EJV Mandarin
94 2.1sd A. 6218 ERT Triton
91 2.0si M. 5187 EWT White

captainhaddock
XM Guru
Posts: 1854
Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 9:43 pm

Re: Interesting XM review / test

Post by captainhaddock » Fri Nov 23, 2012 9:45 pm

Forgive my bad technical English but what do you mean with brittle in this case? I'm looking for new spheres so I have to look for spheres for series 2 instead of 1 or do you get them drilled to 0.7 mm?

User avatar
russ92xmsed
Global Moderator
Posts: 5733
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:23 pm
Location: Cheltenham
Contact:

Re: Interesting XM review / test

Post by russ92xmsed » Fri Nov 23, 2012 9:55 pm

Just a harsher ride I think Jaap. Picks up jolts and ridges a little too much compared to S2.
Russ

1992 K reg XM 2.1 Auto SED RP 5712
1992 K reg XM 2.1 Auto SED RP 5705 (D)
Also
2003 C5 2.2 HDI Exclusive

I sell Engine bay, 1990 COTY, Total & Club XM Sticker Decals
http://www.rjwcreativedesign.co.uk

robert_e_smart
Global Moderator
Posts: 4546
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 1:08 pm

Re: Interesting XM review / test

Post by robert_e_smart » Fri Nov 23, 2012 10:14 pm

There is nothing wrong with the series 2 ride. Its fine. The 16v is the lightest of xms. Diesels at heavy enough to be fine also.
1990 XM 2.1 Turbo SD
2008 Volvo V70 D5 SE Lux Automatic
2009 Volvo XC90 D5 SE Automatic

User avatar
russ92xmsed
Global Moderator
Posts: 5733
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:23 pm
Location: Cheltenham
Contact:

Re: Interesting XM review / test

Post by russ92xmsed » Fri Nov 23, 2012 10:18 pm

No, didn't mean they had an issue.... I think Will means that S2 models ride a little better than S1 cars.
Russ

1992 K reg XM 2.1 Auto SED RP 5712
1992 K reg XM 2.1 Auto SED RP 5705 (D)
Also
2003 C5 2.2 HDI Exclusive

I sell Engine bay, 1990 COTY, Total & Club XM Sticker Decals
http://www.rjwcreativedesign.co.uk

Dieselman
Global Moderator
Posts: 14429
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 6:44 pm

Re: Interesting XM review / test

Post by Dieselman » Fri Nov 23, 2012 10:33 pm

They do, because the damper orifices are larger.
91 3.0 sei M. 4852 EXY Black
92 2.1 sed M. 5740 ECZ Sable Phenicien
92 3.0 V6-24. 5713 EXY Black
92 2.1 sd M. 5685 ENT Blue Sideral
Prev
90 2.1sd M. 5049 EJV Mandarin
92 2.1sd A. 5698 EJV Mandarin
94 2.1sd A. 6218 ERT Triton
91 2.0si M. 5187 EWT White

robert_e_smart
Global Moderator
Posts: 4546
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 1:08 pm

Re: Interesting XM review / test

Post by robert_e_smart » Fri Nov 23, 2012 10:47 pm

They both have their charms. I prefer the series 2. They are better made.
1990 XM 2.1 Turbo SD
2008 Volvo V70 D5 SE Lux Automatic
2009 Volvo XC90 D5 SE Automatic

User avatar
russ92xmsed
Global Moderator
Posts: 5733
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:23 pm
Location: Cheltenham
Contact:

Re: Interesting XM review / test

Post by russ92xmsed » Sat Nov 24, 2012 12:30 am

Not pure XM though :lol: :lol: :lol:

Both have good and bad points.
Russ

1992 K reg XM 2.1 Auto SED RP 5712
1992 K reg XM 2.1 Auto SED RP 5705 (D)
Also
2003 C5 2.2 HDI Exclusive

I sell Engine bay, 1990 COTY, Total & Club XM Sticker Decals
http://www.rjwcreativedesign.co.uk

Post Reply