Page 1 of 2

real or not for real

Posted: Thu May 26, 2016 6:30 pm
by citroenxm
Well.. What do you think...

Photoshop myself.. But interesting...

Re: real or not for real

Posted: Thu May 26, 2016 7:43 pm
by Dieselman
I agree, it's Photoshopped. Citroen should have made that, it would have sold and improved their image.

Re: real or not for real

Posted: Thu May 26, 2016 8:09 pm
by russ92xmsed
Very photoshopped. Close to a modern SM though.

Re: real or not for real

Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 10:26 am
by xantia_v6
russ92xmsed wrote:Very photoshopped. Close to a modern SM though.
Better proportions than the SM.

Re: real or not for real

Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 10:45 am
by MTXM
Yes that is an interesting one, although I think I prefer the four door version on the balance! They seem to have stolen Neil's shiny wheels!! Regards, Matthew T.

Re: real or not for real

Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 12:31 pm
by russ92xmsed
xantia_v6 wrote:
russ92xmsed wrote:Very photoshopped. Close to a modern SM though.
Better proportions than the SM.
I'm curious, what's wrong with the SM's proportions?
I think they are quite well balanced personally. But I know it's not everyone's cup of tea.


I have to agree with you Matthew. Four door is better. The XM is essentially a four door mild reinterpretation of the SM anyway.

Re: real or not for real

Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 12:34 pm
by raynoon
I think it would look better with a set of Italia alloys...

Re: real or not for real

Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 7:01 pm
by xantia_v6
russ92xmsed wrote:
xantia_v6 wrote:
russ92xmsed wrote:Very photoshopped. Close to a modern SM though.
Better proportions than the SM.
I'm curious, what's wrong with the SM's proportions?
I think they are quite well balanced personally. But I know it's not everyone's cup of tea.
The rear flanks of the SM are visually too heavy. I think this is more evident on a real car than in most pictures. On the XM coupe above, the kick-up at the waistline is less pronounced, and there are swage lines to break up the mass of the flanks.

Re: real or not for real

Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 7:09 pm
by MTXM
I am sorry, but I know which one I would prefer sitting on my driveway!! Regards, Matthew T.

Re: real or not for real

Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 7:24 pm
by MTXM
Or even this!! Regards, Matthew T.