Off topic chat about anything you like. Doesn't have to be about XMs (though they will inevitibly come up!). You can even discuss
non-Citroens 
in here!
-
colinxm
- Has changed a sphere or two
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 4:13 pm
- Location: Jørpeland Norway
Post
by colinxm » Tue May 18, 2010 2:34 pm
Can anyone explain to me why the norm now seems to be for "stretch" cylinder head bolts that you first torque down to a low value and then tighten by degrees - e.g 260deg.
How is this better than tightening in stages with the good-old torque wrench to a given value ?
Colin.P
1995 Cit XM 2,1 TD Silver Estate - deceased

2004 Opel Vectra Estate
2008 Kia Ceed td
1989 Pug 205 Cabriolet
1998 Ford Puma
1979 Triumph TR7
-
Dean
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 6116
- Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 7:53 am
- Location: Isle of wight
Post
by Dean » Tue May 18, 2010 5:04 pm
The problem with using a torque wrench to try and evenly tighten down something like a cylinderhead is that one dirty or oily thread and you have one bolt too tight on not tight enough, this is bad news for your soft alloy cylinderhead, with stretch bolts if one bolt is too tight it will stretch to even out the pressure evenly between all fixings giving a more even clamping force, it is the way forward i believe
D
92 Citroen XM Prestige 3.0i Auto R.P5678
14 Mitsubishi L200 Trojan
89 Talbot Express 2.0 coach built Auto-trail Chinook
Addicted to Crackanory
-
colinxm
- Has changed a sphere or two
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 4:13 pm
- Location: Jørpeland Norway
Post
by colinxm » Tue May 18, 2010 5:42 pm
Yup, that makes sense
Cheers Dean
Colin.P
1995 Cit XM 2,1 TD Silver Estate - deceased

2004 Opel Vectra Estate
2008 Kia Ceed td
1989 Pug 205 Cabriolet
1998 Ford Puma
1979 Triumph TR7
-
Dieselman
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 14415
- Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 6:44 pm
Post
by Dieselman » Tue May 18, 2010 6:10 pm
Angle tightening is a more accurate method of applying a given clamping force. The initial torque tension is there just to apply a low but even preload, the angle tightening is what applies the clamping force.
Stretch bolts are used to keep the bolt within it's elastic range of tension, thus, as Dean said, they apply a more uniform clamping force.
People tend to forget how a bolt works, it stretches in length a given amount for each revolution. On some large engines the head nuts are not torqued down at all. The stud is stretched using hydraulic jacks and the nut is wound down hand tight only, then the jacks are released.
91 3.0 sei M. 4852 EXY Black
92 2.1 sed M. 5740 ECZ Sable Phenicien
92 3.0 V6-24. 5713 EXY Black
92 2.1 sd M. 5685 ENT Blue Sideral
Prev
90 2.1sd M. 5049 EJV Mandarin
92 2.1sd A. 5698 EJV Mandarin
94 2.1sd A. 6218 ERT Triton
91 2.0si M. 5187 EWT White
-
citroenxm
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 9987
- Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 9:11 am
- Location: North Wales - FAR far far away!!! :-p
Post
by citroenxm » Wed May 19, 2010 9:13 am
Possibly why the gasket blew on my 2.1
When I was undooing the Head Bolts, they were tight in different tightness ... um.. some were slacker then others..
When I assembled them I tightend down to second torque, then made a reference on the car and then tightened them by the angle Id made..
See what happens now - so far 650 miles ok! No water loss or power loss..
Paul
Projects:(eventually if theres any bodywork left)
93 L Xm 2.1t D auto project
93 L xm V6 12v Sei Manual
Others
In use.. 1995 M reg S2 2.1td auto exclusive
-
Dieselman
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 14415
- Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 6:44 pm
Post
by Dieselman » Wed May 19, 2010 4:48 pm
Paul.
Was the new laminated gasket noticably different in thickness to the regular sintered one? I've spoken to a reconditioners today and they said unless skimming the head just use a regular gasket.
I'm confused now, but might use a regular one as the original one has been on nearly 20 years anyway.
91 3.0 sei M. 4852 EXY Black
92 2.1 sed M. 5740 ECZ Sable Phenicien
92 3.0 V6-24. 5713 EXY Black
92 2.1 sd M. 5685 ENT Blue Sideral
Prev
90 2.1sd M. 5049 EJV Mandarin
92 2.1sd A. 5698 EJV Mandarin
94 2.1sd A. 6218 ERT Triton
91 2.0si M. 5187 EWT White
-
Dean
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 6116
- Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 7:53 am
- Location: Isle of wight
Post
by Dean » Wed May 19, 2010 7:16 pm
not paul but...................i wouldnt worry about the thickness of the gasket, you will never notice it at all and niether will the engine, even if you have to fit a head saver and the top end has not been skimed you would not notice any difference.
ive come to the conclusion that mls are fine for cast blocks or dry liner engines but are a bit iffy on wet/damp liner engines especialy if the liners have sunk a fraction.
The more i look the more mls failures i see so they are by no means indestructable, i have a feeling they were spec'd for vehicles that were renowned for blowing the fire seal out of the H/G or where rigidity problems were experienced with the blocks and thermal cycling caused failure of other more fragile gaskets, i have a feeling they have just cought on as the next new thing, they are certainly a fussy gasket so far as mating surface condition is concerned.
D
92 Citroen XM Prestige 3.0i Auto R.P5678
14 Mitsubishi L200 Trojan
89 Talbot Express 2.0 coach built Auto-trail Chinook
Addicted to Crackanory
-
Dieselman
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 14415
- Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 6:44 pm
Post
by Dieselman » Wed May 19, 2010 7:39 pm
Dean wrote: i have a feeling they were spec'd for vehicles that were renowned for blowing the fire seal out of the H/G or where rigidity problems were experienced with the blocks and thermal cycling caused failure of other more fragile gaskets,
Agreed, specifically for open deck engines like Rover K series and Honda petrols.
Dean wrote:
i have a feeling they have just cought on as the next new thing, they are certainly a fussy gasket so far as mating surface condition is concerned.
D
Reminds me of fitting a genuine gasket to an old Ruston engine, it always leaked compression afterwards due to the copper facing.
I might just go for a cheap standard gasket, after all, I'm sure it's only failing as a result of corrosion rather than compression or other cause.
91 3.0 sei M. 4852 EXY Black
92 2.1 sed M. 5740 ECZ Sable Phenicien
92 3.0 V6-24. 5713 EXY Black
92 2.1 sd M. 5685 ENT Blue Sideral
Prev
90 2.1sd M. 5049 EJV Mandarin
92 2.1sd A. 5698 EJV Mandarin
94 2.1sd A. 6218 ERT Triton
91 2.0si M. 5187 EWT White
-
Dean
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 6116
- Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 7:53 am
- Location: Isle of wight
Post
by Dean » Wed May 19, 2010 8:01 pm
I might just go for a cheap standard gasket, after all, I'm sure it's only failing as a result of corrosion rather than compression or other cause.
Yes, in the case of the XU's i think corrosion is the main cause of failure, After seeing pictures of Pauls gasket and what he has said above about his experience of the head bolts this could just be a bit of a red herring, my guess is improper installation helped that one on its way.
D
92 Citroen XM Prestige 3.0i Auto R.P5678
14 Mitsubishi L200 Trojan
89 Talbot Express 2.0 coach built Auto-trail Chinook
Addicted to Crackanory
-
Peter.N.
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 4002
- Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 8:29 am
- Location: Charmouth, Dorset
Post
by Peter.N. » Wed May 19, 2010 10:15 pm
I fitted a laminated steel gasket because it looked stronger, its certainly much heavier, my original one had rotted away, I couldnt see this steel one doing it. When I bought mine Citroen said they only do one thickness described as a 'repair gasket'. The compression seemed a bit low whan I first fitted it, slow starting, but it soon perked up after a few thousand miles.
Peter
'96 'N' 2.1 td VSX manual estate White RP6695. Sadly gone
2008 C5 2.0. Hdi Estate, Red
2008 C5 2.0. Hdi Estate Silver
Located in Charmouth, Dorset