How Practical is an XM?

Off topic chat about anything you like. Doesn't have to be about XMs (though they will inevitibly come up!). You can even discuss non-Citroens :o in here!
User avatar
Dean
Global Moderator
Posts: 6116
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 7:53 am
Location: Isle of wight

Re: How Practical is an XM?

Post by Dean » Thu Jun 16, 2011 2:56 pm

buy the black onyx with lpg and spend the cash you save on getting the paint sorted and a set of alloys you will still be quids in ahem :)

D
92 Citroen XM Prestige 3.0i Auto R.P5678
14 Mitsubishi L200 Trojan
89 Talbot Express 2.0 coach built Auto-trail Chinook

Addicted to Crackanory

markysimon
Has changed a sphere or two
Posts: 376
Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 5:41 pm

Re: How Practical is an XM?

Post by markysimon » Thu Jun 16, 2011 3:22 pm

Dean wrote:buy the black onyx with lpg and spend the cash you save on getting the paint sorted and a set of alloys you will still be quids in ahem :)

D
Thanks Dean... I'm already on the case and awaiting responses for those concerned! :roll:

Mark
Why don't we do it in the road?

1997 V6 24valve Exclusive
1995 XM VSX Turbo (Deceased)

User avatar
Dean
Global Moderator
Posts: 6116
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 7:53 am
Location: Isle of wight

Re: How Practical is an XM?

Post by Dean » Thu Jun 16, 2011 3:27 pm

Good luck.

D
92 Citroen XM Prestige 3.0i Auto R.P5678
14 Mitsubishi L200 Trojan
89 Talbot Express 2.0 coach built Auto-trail Chinook

Addicted to Crackanory

red_dwarfers
Has changed a sphere or two
Posts: 290
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 6:12 pm
Location: Zomerset UK

Re: How Practical is an XM?

Post by red_dwarfers » Thu Jun 16, 2011 6:05 pm

I've just taken my Xantia off the road to use the XM as a daily driver and I can see no reason that it wouldn't be a good daily driver. Engines are the same as the Xantia, suspension is the same and arguably simpler in some cases, tyres are reasonable.

The only real differences I can see as a new comer to the XM world are the extra creature comforts which in effect are made complex by lots of simple parts put together (digital displays for example, common enough in calculators!). Okay some of these simple parts are poorly designed and implemented (leccy window cables rusting) but they are still easily found and repaired most of the time.

One last point, body panels. Okay, there doesn't seem to be much in the way of spare ones if one needs replacing but at least we're not 406 Coupe owners. I hear things can get very interesting if someone wants a new panel...
'07 C5 2.0 16v HDI VTR estate
'81 GSA 1.3 Club

Dieselman
Global Moderator
Posts: 14433
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 6:44 pm

Re: How Practical is an XM?

Post by Dieselman » Thu Jun 16, 2011 7:08 pm

Rather than spend a lot of money at a specialist trader, I would buy a cheaper, but sound car, and spend the money on making it perfect.
Cars from expensive sellers still have problems which need fixing.

This looks pretty interesting to me.

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/1997-CITROEN-XM-V ... 415aa5b3f4
91 3.0 sei M. 4852 EXY Black
92 2.1 sed M. 5740 ECZ Sable Phenicien
92 3.0 V6-24. 5713 EXY Black
92 2.1 sd M. 5685 ENT Blue Sideral
Prev
90 2.1sd M. 5049 EJV Mandarin
92 2.1sd A. 5698 EJV Mandarin
94 2.1sd A. 6218 ERT Triton
91 2.0si M. 5187 EWT White

citroenxm
Global Moderator
Posts: 9987
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 9:11 am
Location: North Wales - FAR far far away!!! :-p

Re: How Practical is an XM?

Post by citroenxm » Thu Jun 16, 2011 7:11 pm

And its the simpler 2.1 engine... but has semi electronic pump...

And being R reg, I wonder what shes like underneath, and what the strut tops are like!

Paul
Projects:(eventually if theres any bodywork left)
93 L Xm 2.1t D auto project
93 L xm V6 12v Sei Manual

Others
In use.. 1995 M reg S2 2.1td auto exclusive

robertmnorton
Could do a 2.1 headgasket
Posts: 1132
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 10:07 pm
Location: Grantown-on-Spey

Re: How Practical is an XM?

Post by robertmnorton » Thu Jun 16, 2011 8:24 pm

Both my 2.1's spent 5 years in S France,rotating on a 6 monthly basis to avoid re-registration (a bending of the rules as French law required re-registration if more than 6 months in a 24 month period,keeping my UK isurance plus a second insurance from ITALSURE at a French address with a UK plate),each making the 2600 mile round trip twice in that period,the daily commute,shopping and the travel through France,Spain,Andorra and Pyrenees. they pushed through the snow,freezing temps and the blistering heat.Serviced at 5000m intervals they NEVER required anything other than spheres.2 years back in the UK and only an injector,reluctor ring and abs sensor on the EPIC, glowplugs and pump advance to sort on the Bosch.PRETTY DAMN RELIABLE !
robertm

markysimon
Has changed a sphere or two
Posts: 376
Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 5:41 pm

Re: How Practical is an XM?

Post by markysimon » Thu Jun 16, 2011 10:35 pm

citroenxm wrote:And its the simpler 2.1 engine... but has semi electronic pump...

And being R reg, I wonder what shes like underneath, and what the strut tops are like!

Paul
Well if you look closely at the pics, there's rust around the bottom of the O/S/R door... not a good omen! That never looks good on a white car, IMHO.

Mark
Why don't we do it in the road?

1997 V6 24valve Exclusive
1995 XM VSX Turbo (Deceased)

onthecut
Citrobics expert
Posts: 528
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 8:02 am

Re: How Practical is an XM?

Post by onthecut » Thu Jun 16, 2011 11:10 pm

markysimon wrote: with a (good) knowledge of these wonderful but woefully complicated and flawed cars,

Sorry -- have you actually had a look at most modern cars ????? By today's standards the XM is not only not complicated, it's positively steam age. I'm curious which bit you think is 'flawed' ?

Mike.

jamieb
Knows how to use the parking brake
Posts: 148
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 7:04 pm

Re: How Practical is an XM?

Post by jamieb » Fri Jun 17, 2011 6:25 am

"when she was good she was very very good/but when she was bad, she was horrid"

The flaw is something to do with the gap between the potential and reality. The suspension is a) too complicated and b) imperfectly realised for such a complex system. By that I mean for it to be working properly, too many things in the system have to be on song at the the same time. Of course, once a fault has been identified, fixing it is relatively straightforward but each fault could stem from too many causes. To me, this is a flaw. The trade-off between ride quality and complexity is wrong. When the XM suspension is working properly, it's great, but when it's not - and in my case this is too often - it's worse than the simpler system used in my CX, for example.

Jamie
CX 22 TRS (1988-2010 RIP)
XM 2l Turbo (1998)
XM 2.1 Turbo D (1992)
www.jpbuxton.com

Post Reply